<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry McGee on political lobbyists and lobbying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestory.ie/2010/03/27/harry-mcgee-on-political-lobbyists-and-lobbying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestory.ie/2010/03/27/harry-mcgee-on-political-lobbyists-and-lobbying/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 19:29:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cormac</title>
		<link>http://thestory.ie/2010/03/27/harry-mcgee-on-political-lobbyists-and-lobbying/comment-page-1/#comment-3860</link>
		<dc:creator>Cormac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 02:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestory.ie/?p=1553#comment-3860</guid>
		<description>That lobbying piece was the only reason I bought the Times this morn...would have loved a deeper and broader exploration. Viz the acknowledgements to SIPO, that&#039;s only in respect of financial donations.  One could be an ex parliamentarian working for a private limited company or partnership and more effect to party policy on grounds other than financial.  Lest one forget from the lobbyist&#039;s  perspective it is &lt;i&gt; influence&lt;i&gt;  that is the ultimately objective, not making the largest  donation.  For an individual parliamentarian, not in the two chambers, but in committee stage, the paramount is &lt;i&gt; credible information &lt;i&gt; that they require; party finances are the burden of others.  Thus, we have the likes of Glennon, O&#039;Donnell et al. on the private side of politics.

Love it! Would Love It! Bring it On !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That lobbying piece was the only reason I bought the Times this morn&#8230;would have loved a deeper and broader exploration. Viz the acknowledgements to SIPO, that&#8217;s only in respect of financial donations.  One could be an ex parliamentarian working for a private limited company or partnership and more effect to party policy on grounds other than financial.  Lest one forget from the lobbyist&#8217;s  perspective it is <i> influence</i><i>  that is the ultimately objective, not making the largest  donation.  For an individual parliamentarian, not in the two chambers, but in committee stage, the paramount is </i><i> credible information </i><i> that they require; party finances are the burden of others.  Thus, we have the likes of Glennon, O&#8217;Donnell et al. on the private side of politics.</p>
<p>Love it! Would Love It! Bring it On !</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

