Members of the public submitted nearly 19,000 tip-offs last year about welfare fraud alleging use of fraudulent identities, claims for dead people, and benefits getting paid to people in prison.
Figures from the Department of Social Protection show that the largest number of complaints were that people were drawing down welfare payments while working.
In that category, just over 7,100 tip-offs were received, according to data released under FOI.
There were a further 3,600 complaints alleging welfare recipients were living with a partner while claiming the One-Parent Family Payment.
The department received 80 tip-offs last year that claims were being made on behalf of people who were deceased.
A further 38 reports alleged welfare supports were being claimed for a person who was in prison.
A total of 449 tip-offs related to non-payment of PRSI by employers while there were 1,316 allegations that a person was in receipt of welfare despite no longer residing in the Republic.
The department also received 1,930 reports about individuals who had not disclosed the full extent of their assets to qualify for a payment.
There were 1,119 cases where an allegation was made that a person was claiming carer’s supports but was not actually looking after anybody.
A total of 509 reports related to “using a fraudulent identity” while around 2,600 cases were not classified in any specific category.
The Department of Social Protection offers an anonymous service allowing people to make reports of possible fraud.
The majority of tip-offs were submitted using the department’s website, with 13,074 of the 18,792 reports made that way.
Around 2,250 people made allegations of fraud by email while 571 sent a letter outlining their concerns.
The department also reported around 2,900 tip-offs that came in over the phone. A note on their website said: “All reports are dealt with in confidence.”
It said that providing as much detail as possible would help in any investigation.
For people working and claiming, they suggest giving the employer’s name and address, when they started, the type of work involved, and the number of days they work.
In claims relating to prisoners, they seek the name, age, and address of the person involved and when they were sent to jail.
The department also said any reports that suggested a child or vulnerable adult was at risk would be referred to Tusla if appropriate.
Reports could also be shared with other State agencies where “a crime or misappropriation of public funds” was suspected.
The figures do show that a large number of allegations never result in any action by social welfare inspectors.
Of the 18,405 cases recorded as dealt with in 2025, only around 5,400 were referred for further investigation.
There were around 13,000 tip-offs that were closed with no further action, according to the records released.
It is understood this could be for a variety of reasons including a lack of sufficient information, incorrect information, and occasional bogus reports.
Asked about the data, a spokesperson said every report was given a preliminary examination for relevance and to identify the person concerned.
They said: “Where a person can be identified and sufficient information is provided to warrant a further examination, the report is referred to the relevant scheme area in the Department or to a Social Welfare Inspector for further investigation.
“A payment is not suspended or stopped based on the report received. The report received provides a ‘trigger’ for the instigation of a review of a specific entitlement and further investigation if that is warranted.”
The spokesperson added that the tip-offs, given their “hearsay nature,” did not form part of the final decision-making process when a case was considered.
