NAMA reply

By | 1st August 2010

With the help of a good friend, the reply to the preliminary decision of the Commissioner for Environmental Information is complete. It runs to over 6,000 words, and I believe argues strongly that the Commissioner’s preliminary decision is entirely incorrect, erring both in law and in fact.

You can read it here:

NAMA Preliminary Decision Reply

One thought on “NAMA reply

  1. Eoin Ryan

    Well done guys – a lot of hard work went into that. It looks like a very, very strong argument.

    Hopefully this effort will prise NAMA open…. and we will get to see what values have been placed on what properties and by whom…


Leave a Reply to Eoin Ryan Cancel reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.